加载中...

Why Isn’t There A Better Way to Text While Driving?

Why Isn't There A Better Way to Text  While Driving?

It’s deadly. It’s irresponsible. And we’ve all done it. Before you commute home think about this: Why isn’t there a better solution to texting while driving?

Last week in Los Angeles, celebrity plastic surgeon Dr. Frank Ryan drove his car over a cliff while sending a text to Twitter about his his border collie. (Quite possibly this tweet.)

Dr. Ryan’s death is a shame—mitigated only by the fact that he didn’t hurt anyone else. (His dog Jill survived the accident, even.) But it’s impossible not to feel a bit of schadenfreude at his self-inflicted death while doing something so trivial. “Darwin Award!” we chuckle. But we’ve all done it at times—or something equally as distracting while driving.

Texting while driving is especially dangerous, not simply because we’re distracted, but because it necessitates taking one’s eyes off the road, often for many seconds at a time. Anything done while driving is a distraction—looking at an iPod, searching through a purse, even talking on a Bluetooth headset with eyes on the road—simply because it distracts us from the task at hand: piloting a two-ton machine at speeds considered appropriate for only daredevils and experts just a century before. (Tom Vanderbilt’s book ‘Traffic’ addresses this at length, for those interested in statistics.)

But I’ve done it. I suspect many of you have done it. Just last weekend, careening south through rural Missouri in a rented Pontiac, I sent and received a dozen text messages with my sister as we coordinated the logistics of a family emergency. I was upset, tired, and finding being a safe driver difficult enough without trying to peck out letters on a glowing touchscreen with my thumb.

But I did it because that’s what I had to do. I could have pulled over each time. But who does that really?

[Story continues]

‘Google’s Domination of the World and Loss of Mojo 谷歌征服世界’

Yes, it’s another one of those wacky animations from Taiwan. This installment’s target: Google.

Apparently the “Don’t Be Evil” company has lots to answer for. Oh yeah — and Eric Schmidt is The Devil. Enjoy!

Follow us for disruptive tech news: John C. Abell and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

Pitchfork POV Series Demonstrates Power of Slow Growth

<< Previous | Next >>
pitchfork_1

<< Previous | Next >>

Pitchfork continues its expansion into video with the recent launch of its Pitchfork POV Concert Series — a six-camera operation that lets viewers toggle between views as they enjoy the high-fidelity sound so sadly lacking from most online footage of live music shows.

An extension of Pitchfork TV, whose launch we covered exclusively two years ago, this new point-of-view (POV) series continues to position the influential music reviews blog as a provider of cutting-edge music in addition to its usual role as one of its leading critics. The site publishes between 30,000 and 40,000 words per week, and any of its 25 weekly music reviews can make or break a band — if only for a little while.

So when Pitchfork shoots a live performance of a band, its status as music royalty is solidified, to an extent. So far, Broken Social Scene and Free Energy have made the cut. I recently attended The Walkmen’s recent taping (see photos), so that should be online soon too.

First, about these new POV videos: They’re neat.

It felt a bit creepy and voyeuristic, watching an audience-free show being taped. But when you watch online, as intended, the format shines. Some of the cameras are manned, while others are stationary; all six weave together a perspective of a show that’s not available elsewhere. You can watch the whole band or zoom in on just your favorite player. Impressively, lag time is imperceptible when switching between views.

“The way we’re presenting live shows is always evolving,” said Pitchfork publisher and COO Chris Kaskie, who left an ad sales job at The Onion more than six years ago to join the music publication he says he grew up reading. “With POV, it actually stemmed from what Major League Baseball did with the original MLB.tv…where you could watch the game from specific cameras. We thought, This is really rad that you can watch just your favorite player. How can we make that happen with your favorite band member?

“In our eyes, we’ve created something that’s never existed before. You see stuff like this with live streams occasionally [including YouTube's recent live-streamed Arcade Fire show],” Kaskie said, “but ultimately this is more the view from the director’s chair or the editor’s chair.”

Some of the video pros involved with the project work on a freelance basis, but Pitchfork developed the technology behind the POV concert series using in-house talent because, Kaskie said, no out-of-the-box software for that purpose exists.

Overall, Pitchfork’s continued move into the video space has not required an infusion of venture capital, allowing the privately held company — which lacks any debt and has yet to purchase a single advertisement anywhere, according to spokeswoman Audrey Schaefer — to keep its vision intact and free of suits’ tampering ways.

“Obviously, we wanted to build a company that is profitable,” said Kaskie. “But in the end we want it to be [a] sustainable [company] that can do what it wants to do on its own terms. Part of it is stubbornness… There’s a lot of stuff that we could do that we walk away from, that would probably generate more revenue and exposure [because] if we can’t do it ourselves, we move on to the next idea.”

All companies, including large public companies with pressure from stockholders, mid-tier companies with pressure from venture capitalists, and even small businesses like restaurants and bakeries with pressure only from the entrepreneurial mindset that launched them in the first place, have a tendency to try to expand beyond their core competency, betting whatever success they’ve had on risky new ventures.

Pitchfork’s ongoing success with long(ish)-form music criticism, its sold-out music festival in Chicago (selling more tickets would degrade the experience, according to Kaskie), and its continued expansion into the tricky, expensive realm of online music concerts, is an exception to that rule.

The company refuses to expand past what it can finance with its own resources. What a concept.

Photos: Eliot Van Buskirk

Follow us for disruptive tech news: Eliot Van Buskirk and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

iOS Still Receives Majority Of Independent Mobile Ads

iOS still receives majority of independent mobile ads

With AdMob no longer releasing analytics data while it waits for the fallout from Apple’s policies on collecting device data, and Quattro Wireless now under Apple’s wing, Millennial Media is left as one of the largest independent ad networks still providing data on its mobile ad business.

The company’s latest Mobile Mix report shows Apple devices still garnering a commanding share of ad requests, even as Android experiences explosive growth. And the mobile ad business is only getting bigger as smartphones and “connected devices” like the iPad continue to sell.

Like AdMob, Millennial breaks down its data based on the number of ad requests on its entire network. Nielsen says the company reaches approximately 80 percent of the U.S. mobile audience, which gives us the largest data sample outside of Google or Apple.

According to Millennial’s latest data, the iPhone still dominates ad requests, pulling in 55 percent of them in July. However, Android is growing with 19 percent of all mobile ad requests, enough to move it ahead of RIM (16 percent) for the number two spot. Windows Mobile, webOS, and other platforms continue to only account for a very small percentage of Millennial’s ad traffic.

The mobile ad business in general is booming, judging by the growth in overall number of ad requests. Smartphones now account for half of all ad requests on Millennial’s network. Android has experienced explosive growth to reflect its move up Millennial’s rankings, with ad requests up a whopping 690 percent since the beginning of the year.

Android’s gain in overall share has resulted in iPhone and BlackBerry share among smartphone platforms dropping slightly. Even so, both platforms experienced growth in the overall number of ad requests. Since January, total requests from iPhones have increased 15 percent, while requests from BlackBerrys grew 66 percent.

Connected devices — which include touch tablets like the iPad as well as handhelds like the iPod touch and Nintendo DSi — are also increasingly responsible for ad requests. All such connected devices account for 19 percent of ad requests (with the remainder going to feature phones).

Data for the whole year isn’t available, but Millennial said that the iPad experienced a 327 percent growth in ad requests just since June, not surprising for a device that has just launched and has sold in limited numbers. With several Android-based tablets expected to launch later this year, connected devices will be an important space to watch.

Further reading

Follow us for disruptive tech news: John C. Abell and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

Why Are There So Many Porn Ads on Britney Spears’ Facebook Page?

Britney Spears' official Facebook page, which has over four million fans, is rife with links to escort services.

Apologies for the link-bait, but it’s true: Britney Spears’ Facebook page is overrun with erotic pictures, many of them linking to pornographic websites. Either Spears’ “social media expert” is asleep at the switch or this is part of some sort of misguided marketing campaign to sex up the pop star’s apparently-still-too-staid image.

Regardless, when her fans click the Photos link on her Facebook page, they’re confronted with the images like the ones above, many leading directly to hard-core ads for remarkably forward young women advertising their services for free.

We’re hardly ones to proselytize, but this does seem to be a bit much for the singing star, who this week is Tweeting up a storm about her appearance on the mostly squeaky clean Fox show, Glee.

The occasional photo of an actual Britney Spears fan or Spears herself does appear in her list of over 10,000 “Photos from Others,” but the majority or at least the most recent are advertisements for people like “Hilary Portman,” whose message reveals that she is “seeking an above-average guy who is willing to keep up with a 21 years old, fit, drug, disease and drama free chick. It’s gonna be a whole night of ‘pleasing’ and discovering all our erogenous zones.” Her link, like the others, leads to an adult personals site where payment for sex in the style of Craigslist is implied.

It might seem like a lot to ask for Spears’ people to remove the offending “fan photos from Britney Spears” from her Facebook page. (We’ve asked her camp for a response and have yet to hear back). On the other hand, large media presences like her regularly hire social media experts and interns to handle monotonous tasks like accepting friend requests, and it’s easy enough for the regular user to un-tag themselves from unwanted photos.

Why can’t one of Spears’ people get on this? By our rough estimation, based on the fact that the 20th-most-recent photo in the section was added yesterday, it would only take about five minutes per day to keep Britney Spears’ page free of ads for escort services.

We don’t want to waste too much time on this, but it seems worth mentioning that the regularly-updated, Britney Spears-controlled official Facebook page, which presumably attracts lots of her young fan base, is only a couple of clicks away from hardcore advertisements for erotic services (NSFW).

Follow us for disruptive tech news: Eliot Van Buskirk and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

Intel Hedges Bets With $8 Billion Acquisition Of McAfee

Intel designs and manufactures processor chips at plants such as this one, in Hillsboro, Oregon.

Chipmaker Intel Thursday announced a $7.68 billion bid to buy computer security company McAfee, a huge bid to secure the “internet of things” — the billions of chips in connected devices beyond computers.

Intel is the dominant player in traditional computers but the action is moving far away from the desktop, and even from computers in the traditional sense. Now the opportunities are not only in smartphones and tablets but in cars, TVs, ATMs, sensor networks, and medical devices: places and devices where we are just as exposed but have less personal control.

This is a huge growth industry for chip makers, and providing an integrated security layer could make Intel more competitive and trusted among enterprise customers deploying these systems en masse in the next few years.

Intel’s not the only hardware company to start snapping up security companies. Only two days ago HP said it would acquire Fortify, an enterprise security firm. As reported by Computerworld, EMC purchased RSA in 2006, and IBM has bought from Rational, Ounce Labs and WatchFire in recent years.

“With the rapid expansion of growth across a vast array of internet-connected devices, more and more of the elements of our lives have moved online,” said Intel president and CEO Paul Otellini during the announcement. Today’s security software for cellphones, televisions and other connected devices leaves much to be desired, he said.

Otellini also said that “in the past, energy-efficient performance and connectivity have defined computing requirements. Looking forward, security will join those as a third pillar of what people demand from all computing experiences.”

“We have lots of activities going on in growing connected devices … from connected television to mobile devices,” Intel software and services chief Renee James told Reuters. “As we look at the businesses we’re in, we see that security is the No. 1 purchase consideration. We believe that we can enhance security with hardware and come up with a better solution.”

Not everyone sees this quite this way, which may explain why Intel’s stock declined slightly on the news.

“I’m baffled,” Peter Firstbrook, an analyst with Gartner in Stamford, Conn., told Computerworld. “I don’t see any synergy at all between McAfee and Intel.”

The boards of both companies will likely approve the acquisition, according to Intel, and regardless of its reasons, Intel wants McAfee very badly indeed. The company offered 60 percent more than McAfee stock cost when the stock market closed on Wednesday, causing McAfee shares to rise 58 percent in early morning Thursday trading in anticipation of the deal.

Photo courtesy of Flickr/Brad Friedman

Follow us for disruptive tech news: Eliot Van Buskirk and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

“Shit I Say” By Me, Myself and I

Think your Tweets are comparable to the pithy wisdom of Rumi or Nietzsche? Do you rage in your nightmares at the indignities of your Tweets’ ephemeral online existence?

Or do you simply want to make it easier for the world to have your 140-character nuggets of wisdom available on night stands, even if the tubes are tied or net neutrality fails?

Twournal has the solution for you. With very little effort, you can use the service to turn your stream of Tweets into a paperback that you can sell online or share with the world as a PDF, at no cost to you. Twournal prints your book in chronological order and you include your photos in color (for a steep premium) or in gray-scale (for a mere $5 more), You can choose to include replies, if you like. Twournal supports the most popular photo-Tweeting services.

Twournal isn’t the only book-from-Twitter service on the net, a category that includes TweetBookz. But TweetBookz is limited to 200 tweets and doesn’t include photos.

The service is in beta, but Twournal co-founder Avaz Mano promises to send invite codes to the first 300 people who re-tweet this story.

Twournal prices range from $15 to $135, depending on how many tweets you choose (you can choose all, or a range). We created an @Wired book for the most recent 3000 of our Tweets — chose the option for black-and-white photos, and you can get your copy for a mere $36. Twournal also automatically makes a PDF version, which it will e-mail to you within 24 hours.

Unfortunately, to buy the book now, you have to be a beta user, something we assume will change shortly.

To make a book, you must have the password to the Twitter account, and allow Twournal access.

Sellers get to choose their commission. Wired.com choose a dollar commission on each book, the proceeds of which will go to re-filling Wired.com’s beer robot (who incidentally is on Twitter and could have its own book soon!).

The service is especially helpful as an archive — oddly, paper often lasts longer than digital formats.

And since, as everyone now knows, the Web is Dead and no one will visit that wasteland to read your Tweets anyway, you better make the move to print pronto.

Follow us for disruptive tech news: Ryan Singel and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

Facebook Launches ‘Check-In’ Service to Connect People in Real Space

Facebook announced a new Places product Wednesday evening that will let users check-in from a mobile device, see who is around them, let friends or the public know where they are, and find interesting, new places.

The announcement extends, yet again, the reach of the immensely popular social network, in hopes that the new service will convince its 500 million users to feed more information as they move around in the physical world.

The product is not unlike the popular Foursquare location-based service, and lets you “check-in” at a place and send a notification to your friends who are nearby. CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Places has been in testing for a few months, and will be available to U.S. Facebook users starting Thursday.

Zuckerberg said he knew the product was ready when he was showing it off to his girlfriend at a restaurant in a town he didn’t usually go to. She noticed that some friends of theirs she hadn’t seen in a while were at a restaurant next door, and suggested they go say hello.

“It was when that moment happened, that serendipitous moment, that we knew we were ready to go,” Zuckerberg said.

The feature works through a mobile app or browser, where a user wanting to “check-in” can search for a place nearby or add a place to “check-in” to. A user can then write about they are doing, who they are with, what they think of the place and upload a photo.

Each location gets it own newsfeed, where you can see a list of your friends who have been at a place, even if their visit was months earlier.

The point isn’t to make your location totally public, according to Michael Eyal Sharon, Facebook’s lead developer for Places.

“Places is not about broadcasting your location to the world,” Sharon said.

Facebook VP Chris Cox took to the stage to give an emotional speech about the service, imagining Places as a way to get people to go out and connect more, and as a way for people to create stories, saved for posterity, that are tied to a place.

“Technology does not need to estrange us from one another,” Cox said, imagining a scenario of a person going to a bar and being able to see anecdotes from friends’ earlier visits. “The physical reality comes alive with the human stories we have told there.”

“Stories are going to be pinned to a physical location so that in 20 years our children will go to Ocean Beach and their phone will tell them this is the place their parents had their first kiss, and here’s the picture they took afterward, and here’s what their friends had to say,” Cox said.

With Place, you can tag photos and even check your own friends in, by tagging them in a photo or status update. For privacy reasons, if you don’t allow your friends to check you in, then the update won’t show up on your stream. Check-ins also default to being visible to friends-only, though users can change this to wider settings, including to being visible to the entire web.

Users can also remove these tags, just as they can with photos, and users can decide not to allow check-in tagging at all.

The service will be available on the web tomorrow, rolling out to all U.S. users over the next few days.

Outside the United States, users will be able to see check-ins, but won’t be able to check-in themselves immediately. The iPhone app will be updated soon, while Blackberry and Android users will need to wait or use Facebook in a browser.

Facebook is also partnering with a number of companies for the service, including the net’s leading location check-in services Foursquare and Gowalla, as well as Yelp, which also offers check-ins. The companies will use Places beta API to read and write to and from Facebook.

The inclusion of three of the most popular check-in services comes as some surprise, given that many in the tech press had assumed the Facebook check-in service would directly compete with them.

“This is a great thing for smaller location services,” said Foursquare’s Holger Luedorf. “We will continue innovating and have a number of things and want to create a better tips and to-dos service. We will build upon this location check-in and we are looking forward to exploring how we will leverage the Places API.”

With Yelp, every time you check in using the mobile app, you can share to no one, to only your Yelp friends or to Facebook.

See Also:

Beat Censorship By Hiding Secret Messages In Flickr Photos

There may be a message hidden in this picture. Or not. Flickr photo by John C Abell

Georgia Tech researchers have developed a tool called Collage that will allow Internet dissidents to insert hidden messages into Twitter posts and Flickr images in order to circumvent the censorship measures imposed by oppressive governments.

‘This project offers a possible next step in the censorship arms race’

The tool, which is implemented in Python and uses the OutGuess framework, relies on a technique known as steganography to weave hidden messages into an image file. It uses an automated testing tool called Selenium to facilitate the deployment of the messages. The researchers believe that hiding subversive messages inside content that is indistinguishable from legitimate social network activity will reduce the chances of detection.

“This project offers a possible next step in the censorship arms race: rather than relying on a single system or set of proxies to circumvent censorship firewalls, we explore whether the vast deployment of sites that host user-generated content can breach these firewalls,” the project’s website explains. “We have developed Collage, which allows users to exchange messages through hidden channels in sites that host user-generated content.”

It’s worth noting that steganography is one method that was used by the Russian spy ring that was recently detected operating within the United States. As we noted last month, a lot of government surveillance is driven by automated keyword-matching and pattern analysis methods that do broad sweeps, but are blind to simple tricks like steganography. Obscuring the substance of a message in an image and deploying it in a nonthreatening and high-volume medium like a social network would make it harder to find.

The Collage software will be released soon and will be published on the Georgia Tech Network Operations and Internet Security (GTNoise) website.

Further reading

Follow us for disruptive tech news: John C. Abell and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also:

Foxconn Rallies Workers, Leaves Suicide Nets in Place (Updated)

Foxconn Technology Group — the Taiwanese company that manufactures hardware for Apple, Dell, HP, Nokia and Sony and has been hit by a dozen suicides at its plants this year — is holding rallies at all of its factories to raise morale. The theme? “Treasure Your Life, Love Your Family, Care for Each Other to Build a Wonderful Future.” The impact so far? Check out the picture above.

‘No matter how hard we try, such things will continue to happen’

At the rallies, which are slated to be held at all Foxconn factories, the company announced that it would raise the wages of its troubled workforce, more than doubling pay of its factory workers to $293 per month in the case of the company’s Shenzhen compound where a rally was held yesterday, according to Reuters, where its employees had developed a pronounced habit of killing themselves — ostensibly due to the brutal working conditions and low pay.

In case the rallies, slogans and pay increases don’t raise morale enough to stem the tide of suicides, Foxconn left suicide nets in place at its facilities that are designed to catch workers before they hit the ground, although it removed them from one facility (see update below).

“No matter how hard we try, such things will continue to happen,” is how Louis Woo, assistant to the founder of Foxconn’s parent company Hon Hai Precision Industry explained the situation at its factories, in a statement.

According to the company, “success” is the root of the morale problems it’s trying to excise from its workforce.

“For a long period of time, I think we were kind of blinded by our success,” Woo said. “We were kind of caught by surprise.”

Due to the continued success of its manufacturing business — which helps the world’s top electronics brands inexpensively produce high-end tech products which must typically be replaced every 2-3 years anyway — Foxconn plans to expand its workforce 40 percent, while reducing the number of workers in its Shenzhen industrial park from 470,000 to 300,000 or so over the next five years, perhaps to take pressure off of workers at that plant.

So far this year, 12 Foxconn employees have committed suicide, with the latest occurring on Aug. 4, when a 22-year-old female employee leapt to her death from her company-provided dormitory.

Apple, believed to be Foxconn’s biggest customer, said conditions at Foxconn’s Shenzhen plant were “not a sweatshop” and along with Dell and HP, investigated conditions at its manufacturer’s factories, leading to an earlier pay raise. This latest raise precisely mirrors the recommendation of the China Labor Union Bulletin, which asked Foxconn to pay Shenzhen factory workers at least 2,000 yuan per month (the equivalent of $293), up from 900 yuan.

Regardless, China Labor Bulletin spokesman Geoffrey Crothall was not convinced that the raise and accompanying morale rallies will solve all of the problems of these workers, whose cheap wages and long hours are responsible for much of the electronics used by the rest of the world.

“I don’t think today’s event is going to achieve anything except provide a bit of theater,” said Crothall in a statement. “Basically, what Foxconn needs to do is treat its workers like decent human beings and pay them a decent wage. It’s not rocket science.”

Update: AP Shenzhen reported on the Taipei Times today that these nets had been put in place, but they were installed earlier this year. After the rallies, Foxconn left them up at all of its factories except for its Taiyuan Campus location, said Woo in his phone statement, because more employees there have the support of their friends and family. The nets remain in place at the other facilities.

Photo courtesy of the Associated Press

Follow us for disruptive tech news: Eliot Van Buskirk and Epicenter on Twitter.

See Also: